Evaluating effectiveness of public health intervention strategies for mitigating COVID‐19 pandemic

Citations Over TimeTop 23% of 2022 papers

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented global public health challenge. In the United States (US), state governments have implemented various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as physical distance closure (lockdown), stay-at-home order, mandatory facial mask in public in response to the rapid spread of COVID-19. To evaluate the effectiveness of these NPIs, we propose a nested case-control design with propensity score weighting under the quasi-experiment framework to estimate the average intervention effect on disease transmission across states. We further develop a method to test for factors that moderate intervention effect to assist precision public health intervention. Our method takes account of the underlying dynamics of disease transmission and balance state-level pre-intervention characteristics. We prove that our estimator provides causal intervention effect under assumptions. We apply this method to analyze US COVID-19 incidence cases to estimate the effects of six interventions. We show that lockdown has the largest effect on reducing transmission and reopening bars significantly increase transmission. States with a higher percentage of non-white population are at greater risk of increased $R_t$ associated with reopening bars.

Related Papers

• → An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies(2011)11,452 cited
• → A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality(2011)415 cited
• → A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research(2015)283 cited
• → Applying Propensity Score Methods in Clinical Research in Neurology(2021)132 cited
• → Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research(2011)19 cited