Comparison of different J-pouches vs. straight and side-to-end coloanal anastomoses
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum1999Vol. 42(5), pp. 590–595
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Coloanal J-pouch reconstruction adequately restores reservoir capacity after low anterior resection of the rectum. From a functional point of view, side-to-end is not superior to straight coloanal anastomosis. Compared with small pouches, a large pouch design does not lead to better neorectal compliance in the pig model, whereas pouch evacuation seems to be considerably compromised.
Related Papers
- → Colonic J-Pouch vs . Coloplasty Following Resection of Distal Rectal Cancer(2003)105 cited
- → A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch–anal anastomosis: Preliminary results in pigs(1999)83 cited
- → Construction d’un néorectum après exérèse rectale : les réservoirs coliques1Communication présentée au 103e congrès de l’Association française de chirurgie, 4–6 octobre 2001.(2002)3 cited
- → A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch[ndash ]anal anastomosis: Preliminary results in pigs(1999)2 cited
- → [Colon pouch as neorectum. Technique, indications and results].(2001)