Motor Planning, Not Execution, Separates Motor Memories

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers

Abstract

Recent theories of limb control emphasize motor cortex as a dynamical system, with planning setting the initial neural state, and execution arising from the self-limiting evolution of the intrinsic neural dynamics. Therefore, movements that share an initial trajectory but then diverge might have different neural states during the execution of the identical initial trajectories. We hypothesized that motor adaptation maps neural states to changes in motor command. This predicts that two opposing perturbations, which interfere when experienced over the same movement, could be learned if each is associated with a different plan even if not executed. We show that planning, but not executing, different follow-through movements allow opposing perturbations to be learned simultaneously over the same movement. However, no learning occurs if different follow throughs are executed, but not planned prior to movement initiation. Our results suggest neural, rather than physical states, are the critical factor associated with motor adaptation.

Related Papers

• → Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning(2006)1,167 cited
• → Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise(2009)273 cited
• → Cognitive neuroscience of motor learning and motor control(2012)23 cited
• → Optimal control in the critical phase of movement: A functional approach to motor planning processes(2013)17 cited
• → The effects of practice for distance control of lower limb on motor learning in patients with cerebellar ataxia(2018)