Seasonal Characteristics of New Particle Formation and Growth in Urban Beijing
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2020 papers
Abstract
Understanding the atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) process within the global range is important for revealing the budget of atmospheric aerosols and their impacts. We investigated the seasonal characteristics of NPF in the urban environment of Beijing. Aerosol size distributions down to ∼1 nm and H2SO4 concentration were measured during 2018-2019. The observed formation rate of 1.5 nm particles (J1.5) is significantly higher than those in the clean environment, e.g., Hyytiälä, whereas the growth rate is not significantly different. Both J1.5 and NPF frequency in urban Beijing show a clear seasonal variation with maxima in winter and minima in summer, while the observed growth rates are generally within the same range around the year. We show that ambient temperature is a governing factor driving the seasonal variation of J1.5. In contrast, the condensation sink and the daily maximum H2SO4 concentration show no significant seasonal variation during the NPF periods. In all four seasons, condensation of H2SO4 and (H2SO4)n(amine)n clusters contributes significantly to the growth rates in the sub-3 nm size range, whereas it is less important for the observed growth rates of particles above 3 nm. Therefore, other species are always needed for the growth of larger particles.
Related Papers
- → Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation(2019)139 cited
- → Wintertime new particle formation and its contribution to cloud condensation nuclei in the Northeastern United States(2020)34 cited
- → The importance of ammonia for springtime atmospheric new particle formation and aerosol number abundance over the United States(2022)12 cited
- → Malaria seasonality and rainfall seasonality in Sri Lanka are correlated in space(2008)27 cited
- → Estimation of Cloud Condensation Nuclei number concentrations and comparison to in-situ and lidar observations during the HOPE experiments(2019)6 cited