Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Abstract

Trace-level environmental data typically include values near or below detection and quantitation thresholds where health effects may result from low-concentration exposures to one chemical over time or to multiple chemicals. In a cook stove case study, bias in dibenzo[a,h]anthracene concentration means and standard deviations (SDs) was assessed following censoring at thresholds for selected analysis approaches: substituting threshold/2, maximum likelihood estimation, robust regression on order statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and omitting censored observations. Means and SDs for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-determined concentrations were calculated after censoring at detection and calibration thresholds, 17% and 55% of the data, respectively. Threshold/2 substitution was the least biased. Measurement values were subsequently simulated from two log-normal distributions at two sample sizes. Means and SDs were calculated for 30%, 50%, and 80% censoring levels and compared to known distribution counterparts. Simulation results illustrated (1) threshold/2 substitution to be inferior to modern after-censoring statistical approaches and (2) all after-censoring approaches to be inferior to including all measurement data in analysis. Additionally, differences in stove-specific group means were tested for uncensored samples and after censoring. Group differences of means tests varied depending on censoring and distributional decisions. Investigators should guard against censoring-related bias from (explicit or implicit) distributional and analysis approach decisions.

Related Papers

• → A revised Tobit procedure for mitigating bias in the presence of non-zero censoring with an application to milk-market participation in the Ethiopian highlands(2004)25 cited
• → A revised Tobit procedure for mitigating bias in the presence of non‐zero censoring with an application to milk‐market participation in the Ethiopian highlands(2004)19 cited
• → Normal and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals in Bitterlich Sampling(2019)2 cited
• → The effect of withdrawal censoring on two-sample tests(1987)2 cited
• Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Reliability in 1-way ANOVA Random Model(1996)