Use of Structure−Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1996 papers

Abstract

An evaluation of a variety of structure-based clustering methods for use in compound selection is presented. The use of MACCS, Unity and Daylight 2D descriptors; Unity 3D rigid and flexible descriptors and two in-house 3D descriptors based on potential pharmacophore points, are considered. The use of Ward's and group-average hierarchical agglomerative, Guénoche hierarchical divisive, and Jarvis−Patrick nonhierarchical clustering methods are compared. The results suggest that 2D descriptors and hierarchical clustering methods are best at separating biologically active molecules from inactives, a prerequisite for a good compound selection method. In particular, the combination of MACCS descriptors and Ward's clustering was optimal.

Related Papers

• → A General Framework for Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms(2006)66 cited
• → A combined K-means and hierarchical clustering method for improving the clustering efficiency of microarray(2005)65 cited
• → Alternative hierarchical clustering approach in construction of phylogenetic trees(2009)3 cited
• → Hierarchical Clustering(2011)117 cited
• A Grid-based Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm(2009)