Solar Hydrogen Production by Plasmonic Au–TiO2 Catalysts: Impact of Synthesis Protocol and TiO2 Phase on Charge Transfer Efficiency and H2 Evolution Rates
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers
Abstract
The activity of plasmonic Au–TiO2 catalysts for solar hydrogen production from H2O/MeOH mixtures was found to depend strongly on the support phase (anatase, rutile, brookite, or composites thereof) as well as on specific structural properties caused by the method of Au deposition (sol-immobilization, photodeposition, or deposition–precipitation). Structural and electronic rationale have been identified for this behavior. Using a combination of spectroscopic in situ techniques (EPR, XANES, and UV–vis spectroscopy), the formation of plasmonic Au particles from precursor species was monitored, and the charge-carrier separation and stabilization under photocatalytic conditions was explored in relation to H2 evolution rates. By in situ EPR spectroscopy, it was directly shown that abundant surface vacancies and surface OH groups enhance the stabilization of separated electrons and holes, whereas the enrichment of Ti3+ in the support lattice hampers an efficient electron transport. Under the given experimental conditions, these properties were most efficiently generated by depositing gold particles on anatase/rutile composites using the deposition–precipitation technique.
Related Papers
- → Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with H2O on TiO2 Nanocrystals: Comparison of Anatase, Rutile, and Brookite Polymorphs and Exploration of Surface Chemistry(2012)849 cited
- → Bicrystalline TiO2 with controllable anatase–brookite phase content for enhanced CO2 photoreduction to fuels(2013)259 cited
- → Brookite versus anatase TiO2 photocatalysts: phase transformations and photocatalytic activities(2012)253 cited
- → Brookite and anatase nanomaterial polymorphs of TiO2 synthesized from TiCl3(2017)36 cited
- Raman and UV-Vis Absorption Studies on Nanosized TiO_2Particles(2000)