Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein−Ligand Complexes

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2011 papers

Abstract

A largely unsolved problem in computational biochemistry is the accurate prediction of binding affinities of small ligands to protein receptors. We present a detailed analysis of the systematic and random errors present in computational methods through the use of error probability density functions, specifically for computed interaction energies between chemical fragments comprising a protein-ligand complex. An HIV-II protease crystal structure with a bound ligand (indinavir) was chosen as a model protein-ligand complex. The complex was decomposed into twenty-one (21) interacting fragment pairs, which were studied using a number of computational methods. The chemically accurate complete basis set coupled cluster theory (CCSD(T)/CBS) interaction energies were used as reference values to generate our error estimates. In our analysis we observed significant systematic and random errors in most methods, which was surprising especially for parameterized classical and semiempirical quantum mechanical calculations. After propagating these fragment-based error estimates over the entire protein-ligand complex, our total error estimates for many methods are large compared to the experimentally determined free energy of binding. Thus, we conclude that statistical error analysis is a necessary addition to any scoring function attempting to produce reliable binding affinity predictions.

Related Papers

• → Perceiving exterior letters of words: Differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.(1995)32 cited
• → The Jewish–Christian Dialogue Jason and Papiscus in Light of the Sinaiticus Fragment(2021)3 cited
• → A FRAGMENT ON DIFFERENCE(2004)2 cited
• → Fragment based Drug Discovery; Design and Validation of a Fragment Library; Computer-based Fragment Screening and Fragment-to-Lead Expansion(2011)
• → Several commemts on a Genizah fragment of Bavli Eruvin 56a-b, 57a(2018)