Evidence for Through-Space Electron Transfer in the Distance Dependence of Normal and Inverted Electron Transfer in Oligoproline Arrays | doi.page

0 citations0 references

Evidence for Through-Space Electron Transfer in the Distance Dependence of Normal and Inverted Electron Transfer in Oligoproline Arrays

Journal of the American Chemical Society2004Vol. 126(44), pp. 14506–14514

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2004 papers

Scafford A. Serron, W. Stephen Aldridge, Cavan N. Fleming, Ryan M. Danell, Mu‐Hyun Baik, Milan Sýkora, Dana M. Dattelbaum, Thomas J. Meyer

Abstract

Four new helical oligoproline assemblies containing 16, 17, 18, and 19 proline residues and ordered arrays of a Ru(II)-bipyridyl chromophore and a phenothiazine electron-transfer donor have been synthesized in a modular fashion by solid-phase peptide synthesis. These arrays are illustrated and abbreviated as CH(3)CO-Pro(6)-Pra(PTZ)-Pro(n)()-Pra(Ru(II)b(2)m)(2+)-Pro(6)-NH(2), where PTZ is 3-(10H-phenothiazine-10)propanoyl and (Ru(II)b'(2)m)(2+) is bis(4,4'-diethylamide-2,2'-bipyridine)(4-methyl,4'-carboxylate,2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dication with n = 2 (2), 3 (3), 4 (4), and 5 (5). They contain PTZ as an electron-transfer donor and (Ru(II)b'(2)m)(2+) as a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) light absorber and are separated by proline-to-proline through-space distances ranging from 0 (n = 2) to 12.9 A (n = 5) relative to the n = 2 case. They exist in the proline-II helix form in water, as shown by circular dichroism measurements. Following laser flash Ru(II) --> b'(2)m MLCT excitation at 460 nm in water, excited-state PTZ --> Ru(2+) quenching (k(2)) occurs by reductive electron transfer, followed by Ru(+) --> PTZ(+) back electron transfer (k(3)), as shown by transient absorption and emission measurements in water at 25 degrees C. Quenching with DeltaG degrees = -0.1 eV is an activated process, while back electron transfer occurs in the inverted region, DeltaG degrees = -1.8 eV, and is activationless, as shown by temperature dependence measurements. Coincidentally, both reactions have comparable distance dependences, with k(2)( )()varying from = 1.9 x 10(9) (n = 2) to 2.2 x 10(6) s(-)(1) (n = 4) and k(3) from approximately 2.0 x 10(9) (n = 2) to 2.2 x 10(6) s(-)(1) (n = 4). For both series there is a rate constant enhancement of approximately 10 for n = 5 compared to n = 4 and a linear decrease in ln k with the through-space separation distance, pointing to a significant and probably dominant through-space component to intrahelical electron transfer.

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2004 papers

Abstract

Related Papers