Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2007 papers

Abstract

Computations of activation barriers and reaction energies for 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions by a high-accuracy quantum mechanical method (CBS-QB3) now reveal previously unrecognized quantitative trends in activation barriers. The distortion/interaction theory explains why (1) there is a monotonic decrease of ∼6 kcal/mol in the barrier height along the series oxides, imine, and ylide, for each class of 1,3-dipoles; (2) the corresponding nitrilium and azomethine betaines have almost identical cycloaddition barrier heights; (3) cycloadditions of a given 1,3-dipole with ethylene and acetylene have the same activation energies, in spite of very different reaction thermodynamics and frontier orbital gaps. There is a linear correlation between distortion energies (ΔEd⧧) and the activation barrier (ΔE⧧ = 0.75ΔEd⧧ − 2.9 kcal/mol) that is general for substituted and unsubstituted 1,3-dipoles in these cycloadditions. The energy to distort the 1,3-dipole to the geometry favorable for interaction with the dipolarophile, that is, the transition state geometry, rather than frontier molecular orbital (FMO) interactions or reaction thermodynamics, controls reactivity. Interaction energies between the 1,3-dipole and the dipolarophile differentiate dipolarophile reactivity, and FMO interactions influence this.

Related Papers

• → A theoretical study on intermolecular [2+2] radical cation cycloaddition reactions and the competition between concerted and stepwise mechanisms(2016)10 cited
• → Studies on the 1,4-Oxazepine Ring Formation Reaction Using the Molecular Orbital Method.(2000)12 cited
• → Theoretical Study for the [2+2] Cycloaddition Reaction Mechanism of Ketenes and their Derivatives(2019)9 cited
• → A Theoretical Study of the Reaction of Alkynylboranes with Butadiene: Competition between Cycloaddition and Alkynylboration(2002)22 cited
• → A VB model of transition structure regions of the potential energy surfaces for forbidden and allowed cycloaddition reactions(1989)6 cited