Mixed-Valent Metals Bridged by a Radical Ligand: Fact or Fiction Based on Structure-Oxidation State Correlations

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2008 papers

Abstract

Electron-rich Ru(acac)2 (acac- = 2,4-pentanedionato) binds to the pi electron-deficient bis-chelate ligands L, L = 2,2'-azobispyridine (abpy) or azobis(5-chloropyrimidine) (abcp), with considerable transfer of negative charge. The compounds studied, (abpy)Ru(acac)2 (1), meso-(mu-abpy)[Ru(acac)2]2 (2), rac-(mu-abpy)[Ru(acac)2]2 (3), and (mu-abcp)[Ru(acac)2]2 (4), were calculated by DFT to assess the degree of this metal-to-ligand electron shift. The calculated and experimental structures of 2 and 3 both yield about 1.35 A for the length of the central N-N bond which suggests a monoanion character of the bridging ligand. The NBO analysis confirms this interpretation, and TD-DFT calculations reproduce the observed intense long-wavelength absorptions. While mononuclear 1 is calculated with a lower net ruthenium-to-abpy charge shift as illustrated by the computed 1.30 A for d(N-N), compound 4 with the stronger pi accepting abcp bridge is calculated with a slightly lengthened N-N distance relative to that of 2. The formulation of the dinuclear systems with monoanionic bridging ligands implies an obviously valence-averaged Ru(III)Ru(II) mixed-valent state for the neutral molecules. Mixed valency in conjunction with an anion radical bridging ligand had been discussed before in the discussion of MLCT excited states of symmetrically dinuclear coordination compounds. Whereas 1 still exhibits a conventional electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical behavior with metal centered oxidation and two ligand-based one-electron reduction waves, the two one-electron oxidation and two one-electron reduction processes for each of the dinuclear compounds Ru2.5(L*-)Ru2.5 reveal more unusual features via EPR and UV-vis-NIR spectroelectrochemistry. In spite of intense near-infrared absorptions, the EPR results show that the first reduction leads to Ru(II)(L*-)Ru(II) species, with an increased metal contribution for system 4*-. The second reduction to Ru(II)(L2-)Ru(II) causes the disappearance of the NIR band. One-electron oxidation of the Ru2.5(L*-)Ru2.5 species produces a metal-centered spin for which the alternatives RuIII(L0)Ru(II) or Ru(III)(L*-)Ru(III) can be formulated. The absence of NIR bands as common for mixed-valent species with intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) absorption favors the second alternative. The second one-electron oxidation is likely to produce a dication with Ru(III)(L0)Ru(III) formulation. The usefulness and limitations of the increasingly popular structure/oxidation state correlations for complexes with noninnocent ligands is being discussed.

Related Papers

• → A stable binuclear complex containing PdHPd bonds(1984)36 cited
• → Axial ligand exchange of iron(III) tetramesitylporphyrin phenolate complexes(1999)9 cited
• → Low Oxidation State Main Group(2005)1 cited
• Advances of Cr(III) based catalysts for 1-hexene production(2010)
• → Low Oxidation State Main Group(2005)