Critical Comparison of Three Olfactometric Methods for the Identification of the Most Potent Odorants in Cooked Mussels (Mytilus edulis)
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry2000Vol. 48(4), pp. 1307–1314
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2000 papers
Abstract
Three olfactometric methods (olfactometry global analysis, OSME, and AEDA) were compared to evaluate the main impact odorants of cooked mussels. The results obtained from these methods were very similar and well correlated. On the basis of the three techniques, 42 odor-active compounds were detected and 28 were identified. Among these compounds, 6 odorants seem to contribute actively to the aroma of mussels: 2,3-butanedione (4) (buttery, caramel-like odor), (Z)-4-heptenal (14) (boiled potato-like odor), (E)-2-penten-1-ol (17) (mushroom-like odor), 2-ethylpyrazine (19) (nutty odor), methional (25) (boiled potato-like odor), and (E,E)-2,4-octadienal (32) (cucumber-like odor).
Related Papers
- → Gas Chromatography Analysis with Olfactometric Detection (GC-O) as a Useful Methodology for Chemical Characterization of Odorous Compounds(2013)208 cited
- → Evaluation of aroma active compounds in Tuber fruiting bodies by gas chromatography–olfactometry in combination with aroma reconstitution and omission test(2012)36 cited
- Characterisation of aroma volatiles in carrots using GC-Olfactometry and aroma extract dilution.(2003)
- Comparison between Method of Triangle Odor Bag and Method of Dynamic Olfactometry for Odor Concentration of Air(2010)