Ligand Affinities Predicted with the MM/PBSA Method: Dependence on the Simulation Method and the Force Field
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2006 papers
Abstract
The free energy of binding between avidin and seven biotin analogues has been calculated with the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method. We have studied how the force field and the method to generate geometries affect the calculated binding free energies. Four different force fields were compared, but we saw no significant difference in the results. However, mixing the force fields used for the geometry generation and energy calculations is not recommended. In the molecular dynamics simulations, explicit water molecules must be used, but the size of the simulated system and the boundary conditions are less important. In fact, nonperiodic simulations with a fixed protein outside a relatively small simulated system (18 A) seem to be a proper approach. The mean absolute error was 9-19 kJ/mol, with a standard error of 5-15 kJ/mol, which arises mainly from the entropy term.
Related Papers
- → A reference scale of cucurbit[7]uril binding affinities(2021)39 cited
- → Unveiling the novel characteristics of IGPD polymer and inhibitors binding affinities using 12-6-4 LJ-type nonbonded Mn2+ model(2020)5 cited
- → A set of robust fluorescent peptide probes for quantification of Cu(ii) binding affinities in the micromolar to femtomolar range(2015)23 cited
- → The shielding effect of metal complexes on the binding affinities of ligands to metalloproteins(2018)6 cited
- → Synthesis and binding studies of carboxylate binding pocket analogs of vancomycin(2000)15 cited