0 citations0 references

Nanocrystals as Stoichiometric Reagents with Unique Surface Chemistry

The Journal of Physical Chemistry1996Vol. 100(30), pp. 12142–12153

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 1996 papers

Kenneth J. Klabunde, Jane V. Stark, Olga Koper, Connor Mohs, Dong G. Park, Shawn Decker, Yan Jiang, Isabelle Lagadic, Dajie Zhang

Abstract

Nanocrystals of MgO and CaO have been prepared by a modified aerogel/hypercritical drying/dehydration method. For nanocrystalline MgO (AP-MgO) surface areas ranged from 250 to 500 m2/g, whereas for AP-CaO 100−160 m2/g. These materials have been compared with more conventional (CP) microcrystalline samples of lower surface area with regard to (1) morphology (AP-samples (autoclave preparation) are tiny polyhedral crystallites, while CP-samples (conventional preparation) are larger, hexagonal platelets and cubes); (2) residual surface OH (AP-samples have less acidic OH, which are more isolated from each other; (3) acid gas adsorption (AP-samples adsorb more SO2 and CO2 at low pressures and room temperature and prefer monodentate rather than bidentate adsorption modes, but at higher pressures CP-samples adsorb more SO2 and HCl apparently due to the formation of more well ordered multilayers); (4) destructive adsorption of organophosphorus compounds and chlorocarbons (AP-samples are superior due to higher surface areas and higher surface reactivities), and (5) very thin layers of transition metal oxides on the MgO and CaO nanocrystals that significantly enhance destructive adsorption capacities to the point where [MxOy]AP-MgO and [MxOy]AP-CaO become stoichiometric in reaction with CCl4. The data are conclusive that the nanocrystals are more reactive than the microcrystals, and this is mainly attributed to morphological differences, including defects. However, intrinsic electronic effects due purely to “smallness” cannot be ruled out.

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 1996 papers

Abstract

Related Papers