How Wenzel and Cassie Were Wrong

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2007 papers

Abstract

We argue using experimental data that contact lines and not contact areas are important in determining wettability. Three types of two-component surfaces were prepared that contain "spots" in a surrounding field: a hydrophilic spot in a hydrophobic field, a rough spot in a smooth field, and a smooth spot in a rough field. Water contact angles were measured within the spots and with the spot confined to within the contact line of the sessile drop. Spot diameter and contact line diameter were varied. All of the data indicate that contact angle behavior (advancing, receding, and hysteresis) is determined by interactions of the liquid and the solid at the three-phase contact line alone and that the interfacial area within the contact perimeter is irrelevant. The point is made that Wenzel's and Cassie's equations are valid only to the extent that the structure of the contact area reflects the ground state energies of contact lines and the transition states between them.

Related Papers

• → Assessing the Accuracy of Contact Angle Measurements for Sessile Drops on Liquid-Repellent Surfaces(2011)150 cited
• → Methods of contact angle measurements as a tool for characterization of wettability of polymers(2004)30 cited
• → An improved sessile drop method for assessing the wettability of heterogeneous coal surface(2017)9 cited
• → Surface Tension Measurement of Liquid Fe-Si-B Alloy by Sessile Drop Method(2013)2 cited
• → Semiautomatic measurement of contact angles on cell layers by a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis(1989)46 cited