The Maximum of Phosphate Adsorption at pH 4.0: Why It Appears on Aluminum Oxides but Not on Iron Oxides

Citations Over TimeTop 20% of 2009 papers

Abstract

We conducted a series of phosphate adsorption experiments with alumina and hematite at a range of initial P concentrations and pH values. We found that at low initial P concentration of <323 micromol/L for alumina and <194 micromol/L for hematite, phosphate adsorption showed a plateau from pH 2.5 to pH 6.5, followed by an abrupt decrease at pH 6.5-7.0. However, as initial P concentration increased, adsorption on alumina displayed a sharp maximum at pH 4.0, while adsorption on hematite exhibited a steep increase with decreased pH but did not seem to reach a maximum even at pH<3.0. Using surface complexation theory, this study proves that the adsorption maximum at pH 4.0 for alumina results from (1) phosphate being adsorbed preferentially as protonated complexes at low pH and high surface P coverage and (2) surface electric potential approaching a plateau with decreased pH due to the absence of proton-reactive but phosphate-nonreactive triply coordinated hydroxyls at transformed surfaces of Al oxides. The absence of triply coordinated surface hydroxyls at the hydrated oxide surface seems to be the reason why the adsorption maximum appears on Al oxides but not on Fe oxides.

Related Papers

• → Thermal transformations of akaganéite and lepidocrocite to hematite: assessment of possible precursors to Martian crystalline hematite(2008)58 cited
• → Hematite and hematite–akageneite composites. XRD and electrokinetic study and interaction with ionic surfactants(2015)15 cited
• → Ultrathin Polycrystalline Hematite and Goethite−Hematite Core−Shell Nanorods(2009)13 cited
• → Role and Fate of Hematite in Titania Coated Hematite Photocatalysts(2002)3 cited
• The Protonation Equili rium and Decomposition of Amino- and Hydroxyphosphonates, Phos phine Ox ides and Phosphonic Acid(2007)