Electron Transport in Pure and Doped Hematite

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2011 papers

Abstract

Hematite (α-Fe(2)O(3)) is a promising candidate for photoelectrochemical splitting of water. However, its intrinsically poor conductivity is a major drawback. Doping hematite to make it either p-type or n-type enhances its measured conductivity. We use quantum mechanics to understand how titanium, zirconium, silicon, or germanium n-type doping affects the electron transport mechanism in hematite. Our results suggest that zirconium, silicon, or germanium doping is superior to titanium doping because the former dopants do not act as electron trapping sites due to the higher instability of Zr(III) compared to Ti(III) and the more covalent interactions between silicon (germanium) and oxygen. This suggests that use of n-type dopants that easily ionize completely or promote covalent bonds to oxygen can provide more charge carriers while not inhibiting transport.

Related Papers

• → Structural Incorporation of As5+ into Hematite(2013)85 cited
• → Thermal transformations of akaganéite and lepidocrocite to hematite: assessment of possible precursors to Martian crystalline hematite(2008)58 cited
• → Hematite and hematite–akageneite composites. XRD and electrokinetic study and interaction with ionic surfactants(2015)15 cited
• → Ultrathin Polycrystalline Hematite and Goethite−Hematite Core−Shell Nanorods(2009)13 cited
• → Role and Fate of Hematite in Titania Coated Hematite Photocatalysts(2002)3 cited