Comparison of Multiplexed Techniques for Detection of Bacterial and Viral Proteins
Journal of Proteome Research2004Vol. 3(4), pp. 736–742
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2004 papers
Rupa Rao, Steven R. Visuri, Mary T. McBride, Joanna S. Albala, Dennis L. Matthews, Matthew A. Coleman
Abstract
Immobilized antibody microarrays were compared to the Luminex flow cytometry system that utilizes suspensions of polystyrene microbeads covalently coupled with capture antibodies. The two immunoassays were performed for comparison of reproducibility, limits of detection and dynamic range. The Luminex system showed lower limits of detection and increased dynamic range among samples whereas the protein microarrays could be more amenable to miniaturization. Both technologies were capable of sensitive multiplexed detection.
Related Papers
- → Natural head posture--considerations of reproducibility(2002)69 cited
- → Short- and long-term reproducibility of radioisotopic examination of gastric emptying(1990)20 cited
- The reproducibility of reported height and body weight in repeated questionnaire surveys.(1995)
- The reproducibility of scores from three video formats.(1988)
- Comparisons of probing depth measurements with Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe(2005)