Forecasting volcanic eruptions and other material failure phenomena: An evaluation of the failure forecast method
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2011 papers
Abstract
Power‐law accelerations in the mean rate of strain, earthquakes and other precursors have been widely reported prior to material failure phenomena, including volcanic eruptions, landslides and laboratory deformation experiments, as predicted by several theoretical models. The Failure Forecast Method (FFM), which linearizes the power‐law trend, has been routinely used to forecast the failure time in retrospective analyses; however, its performance has never been formally evaluated. Here we use synthetic and real data, recorded in laboratory brittle creep experiments and at volcanoes, to show that the assumptions of the FFM are inconsistent with the error structure of the data, leading to biased and imprecise forecasts. We show that a Generalized Linear Model method provides higher‐quality forecasts that converge more accurately to the eventual failure time, accounting for the appropriate error distributions. This approach should be employed in place of the FFM to provide reliable quantitative forecasts and estimate their associated uncertainties.
Related Papers
- → Catastrophic landslides and frontiers of landslide science(2021)6 cited
- → Landslide Investigation Results in Sapa Town, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam in December 2019(2021)1 cited
- Determination of elastic and creep properties of thin-film systems from indentation experiments(2000)
- CHARACTERISTICS AND STABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE LANDSLIDES AT TENG HIGH SCHOOL(2010)