Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing.

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2010 papers

Abstract

Why do some people have children early, whereas others delay reproduction? By considering the trade-offs between using one's resources for reproduction versus other tasks, the evolutionary framework of life history theory predicts that reproductive timing should be influenced by mortality and resource scarcity. A series of experiments examined how mortality cues influenced the desire to have children sooner rather than later. The effects of mortality depended critically on whether people grew up in a relatively resource-scarce or resource-plentiful environment. For individuals growing up relatively poor, mortality cues produced a desire to reproduce sooner--to want children now, even at the cost of furthering one's education or career. Conversely, for individuals growing up relatively wealthy, mortality cues produced a desire to delay reproduction--to further one's education or career before starting a family. Overall, mortality cues appear to shift individuals into different life history strategies as a function of childhood socioeconomic status, suggesting important implications for how environmental factors can influence fertility and family size.

Related Papers

• → Race and socioeconomic status as confounding variables in the accurate diagnosis of alcoholism(1982)12 cited
• → Socioeconomic status and mental health(2022)1 cited
• Socioeconomic Status and Health: Dimensions and Mechanisms(2008)
• [Physical activity and leisure time in children. I: Relation to socioeconomic status].(1997)
• → Adjustment of Children and Interaction of Parent and Child among Single Mothers in a Disadvantaged South African Community(1997)1 cited