Numerosity but not texture-density discrimination correlates with math ability in children.

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers

Abstract

Considerable recent work suggests that mathematical abilities in children correlate with the ability to estimate numerosity. Does math correlate only with numerosity estimation, or also with other similar tasks? We measured discrimination thresholds of school-age (6- to 12.5-years-old) children in 3 tasks: numerosity of patterns of relatively sparse, segregatable items (24 dots); numerosity of very dense textured patterns (250 dots); and discrimination of direction of motion. Thresholds in all tasks improved with age, but at different rates, implying the action of different mechanisms: In particular, in young children, thresholds were lower for sparse than textured patterns (the opposite of adults), suggesting earlier maturation of numerosity mechanisms. Importantly, numerosity thresholds for sparse stimuli correlated strongly with math skills, even after controlling for the influence of age, gender and nonverbal IQ. However, neither motion-direction discrimination nor numerosity discrimination of texture patterns showed a significant correlation with math abilities. These results provide further evidence that numerosity and texture-density are perceived by independent neural mechanisms, which develop at different rates; and importantly, only numerosity mechanisms are related to math. As developmental dyscalculia is characterized by a profound deficit in discriminating numerosity, it is fundamental to understand the mechanism behind the discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record

Related Papers

• → Vision senses number directly(2010)161 cited
• → Spatial but not temporal numerosity thresholds correlate with formal math skills in children.(2017)62 cited
• → “Groupitizing”: a strategy for numerosity estimation(2020)47 cited
• → Evidence for a number sense(2017)6 cited
• → Non-numerical methods of assessing numerosity and the existence of the number sense(2023)5 cited