The biosecurity benefits of genetic engineering attribution
Nature Communications2020Vol. 11(1), pp. 6294–6294
Citations Over TimeTop 23% of 2020 papers
Gregory W. Lewis, Jacob L. Jordan, David A. Relman, Gregory D. Koblentz, Jade Leung, Allan Dafoe, Cassidy Nelson, Gerald L. Epstein, Rebecca Katz, Michael Montague, Ethan C. Alley, Claire Marie Filone, Stephen P. Luby, George M. Church, Piers Millett, Kevin M. Esvelt, Elizabeth E. Cameron, Thomas V. Inglesby
Abstract
Biology can be misused, and the risk of this causing widespread harm increases in step with the rapid march of technological progress. A key security challenge involves attribution: determining, in the wake of a human-caused biological event, who was responsible. Recent scientific developments have demonstrated a capability for detecting whether an organism involved in such an event has been genetically modified and, if modified, to infer from its genetic sequence its likely lab of origin. We believe this technique could be developed into powerful forensic tools to aid the attribution of outbreaks caused by genetically engineered pathogens, and thus protect against the potential misuse of synthetic biology.
Related Papers
- → Biosecurity assessment of layer farms in Central Luzon, Philippines(2019)18 cited
- → The International Legal Framework for Biosecurity and the Challenges Ahead(2010)16 cited
- Gap between producers and veterinarians regarding biosecurity on Quebec dairy farms.(2020)
- → Perspectives of on‐farm biosecurity and disease prevention among selected pig veterinarians and pig farmers in Sweden(2023)7 cited
- Biosecurity assessment on pig farms(2016)