Experimental subjects are not different
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2013 papers
Abstract
Experiments using economic games are becoming a major source for the study of human social behavior. These experiments are usually conducted with university students who voluntarily choose to participate. Across the natural and social sciences, there is some concern about how this "particular" subject pool may systematically produce biased results. Focusing on social preferences, this study employs data from a survey-experiment conducted with a representative sample of a city's population (N = 765). We report behavioral data from five experimental decisions in three canonical games: dictator, ultimatum and trust games. The dataset includes students and non-students as well as volunteers and non-volunteers. We separately examine the effects of being a student and being a volunteer on behavior, which allows a ceteris paribus comparison between self-selected students (students*volunteers) and the representative population. Our results suggest that self-selected students are an appropriate subject pool for the study of social behavior.
Related Papers
- → Distributive and reciprocal fairness: What can we learn from the heterogeneity of social preferences?(2011)37 cited
- → Social Versus Moral Preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A Theoretical Model and an Experiment(2018)1 cited
- → Norms Make Preferences Social(2013)1 cited
- Time as a Medium of Reward in Three Social Preference Experiments(2012)
- → Social versus Moral preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A theoretical\n model and an experiment(2018)