Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used in genetic dissection of complex traits. However, common methods are all based on a fixed-SNP-effect mixed linear model (MLM) and single marker analysis, such as efficient mixed model analysis (EMMA). These methods require Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, which often is too conservative when the number of markers is extremely large. To address this concern, we proposed a random-SNP-effect MLM (RMLM) and a multi-locus RMLM (MRMLM) for GWAS. The RMLM simply treats the SNP-effect as random, but it allows a modified Bonferroni correction to be used to calculate the threshold p value for significance tests. The MRMLM is a multi-locus model including markers selected from the RMLM method with a less stringent selection criterion. Due to the multi-locus nature, no multiple test correction is needed. Simulation studies show that the MRMLM is more powerful in QTN detection and more accurate in QTN effect estimation than the RMLM, which in turn is more powerful and accurate than the EMMA. To demonstrate the new methods, we analyzed six flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana and detected more genes than previous reported using the EMMA. Therefore, the MRMLM provides an alternative for multi-locus GWAS.

Related Papers

• → False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies(2014)1,471 cited
• → Multiple Comparisons Controlling Expected Number of False Discoveries(2014)1 cited
• → Comparison and analysis of multiple testing methods for microarray gene expression data(2014)1 cited
• → A Complete Review of Controlling the FDR in a Multiple Comparison Problem Framework -- The Benjamini-Hochberg Algorithm(2014)1 cited
• 유전자 발현 데이터에 대한 다중검정법 비교 및 분석(2014)