Genome-wide characterization of microsatellites in Triticeae species: abundance, distribution and evolution
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Abstract
Microsatellites are an important constituent of plant genome and distributed across entire genome. In this study, genome-wide analysis of microsatellites in 8 Triticeae species and 9 model plants revealed that microsatellite characteristics were similar among the Triticeae species. Furthermore, genome-wide microsatellite markers were designed in wheat and then used to analyze the evolutionary relationship of wheat and other Triticeae species. Results displayed that Aegilops tauschii was found to be the closest species to Triticum aestivum, followed by Triticum urartu, Triticum turgidum and Aegilops speltoides, while Triticum monococcum, Aegilops sharonensis and Hordeum vulgare showed a relatively lower PCR amplification effectivity. Additionally, a significantly higher PCR amplification effectivity was found in chromosomes at the same subgenome than its homoeologous when these markers were subjected to search against different chromosomes in wheat. After a rigorous screening process, a total of 20,666 markers showed high amplification and polymorphic potential in wheat and its relatives, which were integrated with the public available wheat markers and then anchored to the genome of wheat (CS). This study not only provided the useful resource for SSR markers development in Triticeae species, but also shed light on the evolution of polyploid wheat from the perspective of microsatellites.
Related Papers
- → Biosystematics and evolutionary relationships of perennial Triticeae species revealed by genomic analyses(2014)62 cited
- → Genetic Relationships Among Five Basic Genomes St, E, A, B and D in Triticeae Revealed by Genomic Southern and in situ Hybridization(2007)61 cited
- → CAPS markers specific to Eb, Ee, and R genomes in the tribe Triticeae(2007)31 cited
- → Comparative mapping in grasses. Oat relationships(1995)261 cited
- → Comparative mapping in grasses. Wheat relationships(1995)168 cited