Distinct thermal runaway mechanisms of sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries
Energy & Environmental Science2023Vol. 16(8), pp. 3552–3563
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2023 papers
Xinyu Rui, Dongsheng Ren, Xiang Liu, Xiaodan Wang, Kuangyu Wang, Yao Lü, Linwei Li, Pengbo Wang, Gaolong Zhu, Yuqiong Mao, Xuning Feng, Languang Lu, Hewu Wang, Minggao Ouyang
Abstract
All-solid-state batteries with sulfide electrolytes are not absolutely safe as supposed. Here, two distinct thermal failure routes are unveiled for sulfide-based ASSBs, namely the gas–solid and solid–solid reactions.
Related Papers
- → Operando monitoring of thermal runaway in commercial lithium-ion cells via advanced lab-on-fiber technologies(2023)315 cited
- → A review of thermal runaway prevention and mitigation strategies for lithium-ion batteries(2022)250 cited
- → Key Characteristics for Thermal Runaway of Li-ion Batteries(2019)113 cited
- → Comparative analysis of thermal runaway characteristics of lithium‐ion battery under oven test and local high temperature(2021)10 cited
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)