Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature
Clinical Science2017Vol. 131(20), pp. 2525–2532
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers
Zsanett Bahor, Jing Liao, Malcolm Macleod, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown, Sarah McCann, Kimberley E. Wever, James Thomas, Thomas Ottavi, David W. Howells, Andrew P. Rice, Sophia Ananiadou, Emily S. Sena
Abstract
There remains substantial opportunity for improvement in the reporting of animal research modelling stroke, particularly in the lacunar stroke literature. Further, automated tools perform sufficiently well to identify whether studies report blinded assessment of outcome, but improvements are required in the tools to ascertain whether randomization and a sample size calculation were reported.
Related Papers
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)
- Коммуникaтивно- прaгмaтический aнaлиз дипломaтических бумaг (нa основе вербaльных нот)(2018)
- FEATURES AND DIFFERENCES OF ADEQUATE AND EQUIVALENT TRANSLATION(2018)
- चितलवाना पंचायत समिति में मानव गरीबी सूचकांक - 2016 ( à¤à¤• गà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤® सà¥à¤¤à¤°à¥€à¤¯ à¤à¥Œà¤—ोलिक अधà¥à¤¯à¤¯à¤¨ )(2017)