A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
New England Journal of Medicine2004Vol. 351(16), pp. 1607–1618
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2004 papers
Monique Prinssen, Eric L.G. Verhoeven, Jaap Buth, Philippe W.M. Cuypers, Marc R.H.M. van Sambeek, Ron Balm, Erik Buskens, Diederick E. Grobbee, Jan D. Blankensteijn
Abstract
On the basis of the overall results of this trial, endovascular repair is preferable to open repair in patients who have an abdominal aortic aneurysm that is at least 5 cm in diameter. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine whether this advantage is sustained.
Related Papers
- → A Case of Non-junctional Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Forming Kissing Aneurysms with an IC-PC Aneurysm(2003)5 cited
- → P08 Detection of cerebral aneurysms in unenhanced CT images of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage using the sparing aneurysm sign (SAS)(2022)1 cited
- 다수의 Aneurysm에서 Rupture Aneurysm의 Location 및 Shape에 관한 연구(2014)
- A compatision between one visit RCT and several visit RCT for cracked teeth.(2007)
- Basical Clinical Observation of Cracked Tooth with One visit RCT(2003)