Coronary Intervention for Persistent Occlusion after Myocardial Infarction
New England Journal of Medicine2006Vol. 355(23), pp. 2395–2407
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2006 papers
Judith S. Hochman, Gervasio A. Lamas, Christopher E. Buller, Vladimír Džavík, Harmony R. Reynolds, Staci Abramsky, Sandra Forman, Witold Rużyłło, Aldo P. Maggioni, Harvey D. White, Zygmunt Sadowski, Antônio Carlos Carvalho, Jamie Rankin, Jean Renkin, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Alice M. Mascette, George Sopko, Matthias Pfisterer, Jonathan Leor, Viliam Fridrich, Daniel B. Mark, Genell L. Knatterud
Abstract
PCI did not reduce the occurrence of death, reinfarction, or heart failure, and there was a trend toward excess reinfarction during 4 years of follow-up in stable patients with occlusion of the infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days after myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004562 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Related Papers
- → Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(2013)463 cited
- → Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention(2020)154 cited
- → Impact of Gender on Elective and Non-Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(2007)
- → Abstract 161: National Trends in Use of Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: 2001-2011(2015)