Fifty years to prove Malthus right

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers

Abstract

A major question confronting sustainability research today is to what extent our planet, with a finite environmental resource base, can accommodate the faster than exponentially growing human population. Although these concerns are generally attributed to Malthus (1766–1834), early attempts to estimate the maximum sustainable population (ergo, the carrying capacity K) were reported by van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723) to be at 13 billion people (1). Since then, the concept of carrying capacity has evolved to accommodate many resource limitations originating from available water, energy, and other ecosystem goods and services (1, 2). In PNAS, Suweis et al. (3) apply the concept of carrying capacity using fresh water availability on a national scale as the limiting resource to infer the global K. They estimate a decline in global human population by the middle of this century. We ask to what extent models that are premised on a constant global K as in Suweis et al. (3) agree with an alternative class of carrying capacity models on predicting the timing for unsustainable global population growth. In particular, factors that symbolize innovation and adaptation lead to K representations that are not constant (4, 5) but may depend on a dynamic population size.

Related Papers

• → European Sweet Vernal Grasses (<I>Anthoxanthum</I>: Poaceae, Pooideae, Aveneae): A Morphometric Taxonomical Approach(2007)29 cited
• → Cloning and Characterization of Rat BAT3 cDNA(1999)20 cited
• → Anthoxanthum Mosaic Virus(1970)6 cited
• → HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (Bat3)/Scythe is essential for p300-mediated acetylation of p53(2007)127 cited
• → Ecological and evolutionary importance of neighbors in the grass Anthoxanthum odoratum(1990)20 cited