Moral dilemma in adolescence: The role of values, prosocial moral reasoning and moral disengagement in helping decision making

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers

Abstract

The decision-making process was investigated in which a request for help was explicit but clearly not in the helper's personal interest. Based on Eisenberg's theory on prosocial moral reasoning, Schwartz's theory on basic human values and Bandura's moral disengagement theory it was hypothesized that personal values influence prosocial moral reasoning and moral disengagement, which in turn support or inhibit the propensity to help in a high-cost situation for the helper. Using moral dilemma scenarios, a sample of 171 adolescents (50% male) were asked to consider whether or not to offer their assistance. Adolescents also filled out the Prosocial Reasoning Objective Measure, the Portrait Values Questionnaire and the Moral Disengagement Scale. Results showed that despite internalization of other-oriented values and more internalized prosocial reasoning, moral disengagement contributed to the avoidance of moral responsibility and allowed potential helpers to prioritize their own needs.

Related Papers

• → Moral Judgments as Educated Intuitions(2017)59 cited
• → Defining features of moral sensitivity and moral motivation: pathways to moral reasoning in medical students1(2006)82 cited
• → The concept of the moral domain in moral foundations theory and cognitive developmental theory: Horses for courses?(2013)10 cited
• → Moral Reasoning about Real-Life Dilemmas: Paradox in Research Using the Defining Issues Test(1997)14 cited
• → Morality and Psychology: A Conceptual Study of the Intersectional Relationship(2017)