Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2012 papers

Abstract

The study investigates the idea that feeling good and functioning well-being are regulated by two different mechanisms: hedonic and eudaimonic. At the state level it is assumed that happiness is a hedonic feeling typically experienced when life is easy or a goal is reached. Inspiration is a eudaimonic feeling typically experienced when facing challenges in the process of goal attainment. At the trait level, we assume that personal growth is connected with eudaimonic rather than hedonic mechanisms. These assumptions were confirmed with data from 465 employees of the Occupational Health Services in Norway using day reconstruction method. Multilevel analyses showed that complex work situations increased inspiration and decreased happiness. Personal growth had a stronger effect on inspiration than on happiness. Our results support the idea that pleasant feelings (hedonia) and optimal functioning (eudaimonia) have different roles to play in the regulation of behavior, and therefore need to be distinguished from one another.

Related Papers

• → Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction(2006)2,089 cited
• → Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives(2009)1,219 cited
• → Aversion to Happiness Across Cultures: A Review of Where and Why People are Averse to Happiness(2013)238 cited
• → The Naturally Emerging Structure of Well-Being Among Young Adults: “Big Two” or Other Framework?(2014)38 cited
• → Evidence of Associations Between Lay Conceptions of Well-Being, Conception-Congruent Behavior, and Experienced Well-Being(2012)18 cited