Sexual Conflict and the Energetic Costs of Mating and Mate Choice in Water Striders

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1998 papers

Abstract

Analyses of intersexual conflicts of interest over courtship, mating, or mate guarding require an understanding of the physiological costs of sexual interaction. Repeated respirometric measures of energetic expenditure were taken on female Aquarius remigis while unladen and while carrying a mating male, a small metal weight, or a euthanized male. Unladen "cruising" locomotion consumed an average of 334.6 microW of energy (82 J kg-1 m-1); this estimate of the cost of locomotion coincides with measures from voluntarily locomoting arthropods of similar mass and represents the first energetic measure of skating on a water surface. Cruising females carrying males or metal weights consumed 24% and 28% more energy than unladen females, respectively. Females engaged in "escape" locomotion consumed 43% more energy while carrying a male than while unladen. Further, our study shows that premating struggles, and therefore selective mating decisions, are energetically costly. Struggling females consumed an average of 936.6 microW, a 126% increase compared to cruising, nonstruggling females, and 64% more than mating females engaged in escape locomotion. We develop a quantitative model showing that at a certain harassment rate threshold, accepting superfluous matings becomes the "best of a bad job" for females.

Related Papers

• → EVOLUTION OF MALE AND FEMALE GENITALIA FOLLOWING RELEASE FROM SEXUAL SELECTION(2011)88 cited
• → EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT SEXUAL CONFLICT INFLUENCES THE OPPORTUNITY, FORM AND INTENSITY OF SEXUAL SELECTION(2008)84 cited
• → Finding love: fruit fly males evolving under higher sexual selection are inherently better at finding receptive females(2022)7 cited
• → Fluctuating sexual selection and the evolution of a courtship strategy(2016)6 cited