Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment andq

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2000 papers

Abstract

Many recent empirical investment studies have found that the investment of financially constrained firms responds strongly to cash flow. Paralleling these findings is the disappointing performance of the q theory of investment: even though marginal q should summarize the effects of all factors relevant to the investment decision, cash flow still matters. We examine whether this failure is due to error in measuring marginal q. Using measurement errorconsistent generalized method of moments estimators, we find that most of the stylized facts produced by investment-q cash flow regressions are artifacts of measurement error. Cash flow does not matter, even for financially constrained firms, and despite its simple structure, q theory has good explanatory power once purged of measurement error.

Related Papers

• → The Usefulness of Direct and Indirect Cash Flow Disclosures(2002)72 cited
• → Measurement Error Versus Repeated Measurements: A Guide Describing Two Methods for Computing Bias and Precision of Migration Measurements From Double Examinations Using Radiostereometric Analysis(2022)10 cited
• → Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers(2017)10 cited
• → The Usefulness of Direct and Indirect Cash Flow Disclosures(2001)30 cited
• → The Optimal Model for Operating Cash Flow in Chinese Industries(2018)