Spatial Heterogeneity, Source‐Sink Dynamics, and the Local Coexistence of Competing Species

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2001 papers

Abstract

Patch occupancy theory predicts that a trade-off between competition and dispersal should lead to regional coexistence of competing species. Empirical investigations, however, find local coexistence of superior and inferior competitors, an outcome that cannot be explained within the patch occupancy framework because of the decoupling of local and spatial dynamics. We develop two-patch metapopulation models that explicitly consider the interaction between competition and dispersal. We show that a dispersal-competition trade-off can lead to local coexistence provided the inferior competitor is superior at colonizing empty patches as well as immigrating among occupied patches. Immigration from patches that the superior competitor cannot colonize rescues the inferior competitor from extinction in patches that both species colonize. Too much immigration, however, can be detrimental to coexistence. When competitive asymmetry between species is high, local coexistence is possible only if the dispersal rate of the inferior competitor occurs below a critical threshold. If competing species have comparable colonization abilities and the environment is otherwise spatially homogeneous, a superior ability to immigrate among occupied patches cannot prevent exclusion of the inferior competitor. If, however, biotic or abiotic factors create spatial heterogeneity in competitive rankings across the landscape, local coexistence can occur even in the absence of a dispersal-competition trade-off. In fact, coexistence requires that the dispersal rate of the overall inferior competitor not exceed a critical threshold. Explicit consideration of how dispersal modifies local competitive interactions shifts the focus from the patch occupancy approach with its emphasis on extinction-colonization dynamics to the realm of source-sink dynamics. The key to coexistence in this framework is spatial variance in fitness. Unlike in the patch occupancy framework, high rates of dispersal can undermine coexistence, and hence diversity, by reducing spatial variance in fitness.

Related Papers

• → Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes(1994)509 cited
• → Dispersal‐induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities(2004)112 cited
• → Regional occupancy increases for widespread species but decreases for narrowly distributed species in metacommunity time series(2023)59 cited
• → Pattern Does Not Equal Process: What Does Patch Occupancy Really Tell Us about Metapopulation Dynamics?(2002)15 cited
• → Can occupancy patterns be used to predict distributions in widely separated geographic regions?(2006)11 cited