Underdetermination and the Problem of Identical Rivals
Citations Over Time
Abstract
If two theory formulations are merely different expressions of the same theory, then any problem of choosing between them cannot be due to the underdetermination of theories by data. So one might suspect that we need to be able to tell distinct theories from mere alternate formulations before we can say anything substantive about underdetermination, that we need to solve the problem of identical rivals before addressing the problem of underdetermination. Here I consider two possible solutions: Quine proposes that we call two theories identical if they are equivalent under a reconstrual of predicates, but this would mishandle important cases. Another proposal is to defer to the particular judgements of actual scientists. Consideration of an historical episode—the alleged equivalence of wave and matrix mechanics—shows that this second proposal also fails. Nevertheless, I suggest, the original suspicion is wrong; there are ways to enquire into underdetermination without having solved the problem of identical rivals.
Related Papers
- → Can Theoretical Underdetermination support the Indeterminacy of Translation? Revisiting Quine's ‘Real Ground’(2010)3 cited
- → The Underdetermination/Indeterminacy Distinction and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction(2019)1 cited
- → Underdetermination and Meaning Indeterminacy: What is the Difference?(2008)1 cited
- → Conteúdo empírico de teorias e subdeterminação em Willard Quine(1998)1 cited
- Confirmation Holism and Underdetermination in Quine's Thought Holismo confirmacional e subdeterminação no pensamento de Quine(2012)