Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 1999 papers

Abstract

Discretionary parole release and parole field services have undergone major changes as the nation has embraced more punitive policies. Fourteen states have abolished discretionary parole release for all offenders, and twenty-one others severely limit its use. Parole supervision remains, but needed treatment programs are scarce, and parole officers focus on surveillance more than rehabilitation. About half of parolees fail to complete parole successfully, and their returns to prison represent about a third of incoming prisoners. Given an average (median) prison term served of fifteen months, more than half of all inmates now in prison will be in the community in less than two years. Developing programs to reduce parole recidivism should be a top priority, and a few agencies are operating successful job-training and substance abuse programs. Experts argue that a new parole model is sorely needed, one that incorporates advances in technology, risk prediction, effective rehabilitation, and more "active" forms of supervision that incorporate citizens and others who know the offender. Such reforms are more promising than parole abolition, in that they reduce the public safety risks posed by parolees and increase the chances that offenders will succeed.

Related Papers

• → From the street to the prison, from the prison to the street: understanding and responding to prison gangs(2011)92 cited
• → When Prison Becomes the Devil’s Workshop: The Association Between Idleness and Post-Release Employment, Recidivism, and Mortality(2023)5 cited
• → The Impact of Prison Programming on Recidivism(2017)14 cited
• → Mothering Behind Bars: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Prison Nursery Programs on Recidivism Reduction(2019)14 cited
• → The Economics of Punitive Damages: Post State Farm v. Campbell(2006)