Identification of Factors That Disrupt Negative Air Pressurization of Respiratory Isolation Rooms
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology2000Vol. 21(3), pp. 191–195
Citations Over TimeTop 17% of 2000 papers
Nicholas Pavelchak, Ronald P. DePersis, Matthew London, Rachel L. Stricof, Margaret J. Oxtoby, George T. DiFerdinando, Elizabeth G. Marshall
Abstract
A substantial percentage of IRs did not meet the negative air pressure criterion. These failures were associated with a variety of characteristics in the design and operation of the IRs. Our findings indicate that a balanced ventilation system does not guarantee inward airflow direction. Devices that continuously monitor and, in some cases, control the pressurization of IRs had poor reliability. This study demonstrates the utility of using visible smoke for testing directional airflow of IRs, whether or not continuous monitors are used. Institutional tuberculosis control pro grams should include provisions for appropriate monitoring and maintenance of IR systems on a frequent basis, including the use of visible smoke.
Related Papers
- → Numerical study of transient indoor airflow and virus-laden droplet dispersion: Impact of interactive human movement(2023)38 cited
- → Multi‐person movement‐induced airflow and the effects on virus‐laden expiratory droplet dispersion in indoor environments(2022)23 cited
- → Three‐dimensional analysis of the effect of human movement on indoor airflow patterns(2020)55 cited
- → The effect of opening windows on the airflow distribution inside naturally ventilated residential bedrooms with ceiling fans(2021)13 cited
- → DESIGN GUIDELINES ON VERTICAL AIRFLOW IN BUILDINGS AND URBAN AREAS(1985)2 cited