Comparative Efficacy versus Effectiveness of Initial Antiretroviral Therapy in Clinical Trials versus Routine Care
Clinical Infectious Diseases2010Vol. 50(4), pp. 574–584
Citations Over TimeTop 17% of 2010 papers
Justin S. Routman, James H. Willig, Andrew O. Westfall, Sarah Abroms, Mohit Varshney, Sunil Adusumilli, Jeroan J. Allison, Karen Savage, Michael S. Saag, Michael J. Mugavero
Abstract
Although marked differences in efficacy versus effectiveness have been observed in the therapeutic outcomes of other conditions, our analyses found no evidence of such divergence among our patients who initiated antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Related Papers
- → The Relation Between Symptoms, Viral Load, and Viral Load Set Point in Primary HIV Infection(2007)88 cited
- → Raised viral load in patients with viral suppression on highly active antiretroviral therapy: transient increase or treatment failure?(2002)42 cited
- → Lack of evidence of a stable viral load set-point in early stage asymptomatic patients with chronic HIV-1 infection(1998)21 cited
- → Assessment of the Cavidi ExaVir Load Assay for Monitoring Plasma Viral Load in HIV-2-Infected Patients(2017)6 cited
- → Near point-of-care HIV viral load testing: Uptake and utilization in suburban Yangon, Myanmar(2022)