Lincoln, Emancipation, and the Limits of Constitutional Change
The Supreme Court Review2008Vol. 2008(1), pp. 349–387
Citations Over Time
Abstract
This article examines the policy behind President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation with the assumption that it would be challenged legally, while this never happened because its legality became moot after the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, Lincoln aimed to keep the proclamation as narrowly focused and constitutionally solid as possible. The article explores constitutional limitations on emancipation, the conditions leading up to emancipation, and the lasting effects of the emancipation during and following the Civil War.
Related Papers
- → Paradoxes of Constitutional Faith: Federalism, Emancipation, and the Original Thirteenth Amendment(2016)1 cited
- The Emancipation Proclamation as a Constitutional Document: Why it is and Why it Matters(2009)
- Lincoln's Constitution Revisited(2009)