Digestive Capacity and Toxicity Cause Mixed Diets in Red Knots That Maximize Energy Intake Rate
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2014 papers
Abstract
Among energy-maximizing animals, preferences for different prey can be explained by ranking the prey according to their energetic content. However, diet choice also depends on characteristics of the predator, such as the need to ingest necessary nutrients and the constraints imposed by digestion and toxins in food. In combination, these factors can lead to mixed diets in which the energetically most profitable food is not eaten exclusively even when it is abundant. We studied diet choice in red knots (Calidris canutus canutus) feeding on mollusks at a West African wintering site. At this site, the birds fed primarily on two species of bivalves, a thick-shelled one (Dosinia isocardia) that imposed a digestive constraint and a thin-shelled one (Loripes lucinalis) that imposed a toxin constraint. The latter species is toxic due to its symbiotic association with sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. We estimated experimentally the parameters of a linear programming model that includes both digestive and toxin constraints, leading to the prediction that red knots should eat a mixture of both mollusk species to maximize energy intake. The model correctly predicted the preferences of the captive birds, which depended on the digestive quality and toxicity of their previous diet. At our study site, energy-maximizing red knots appear to select a mixed diet as a result of the simultaneous effects of digestive and toxin constraints.
Related Papers
- → HOW PREY RESPOND TO COMBINED PREDATORS: A REVIEW AND AN EMPIRICAL TEST(2003)294 cited
- → You can run—or you can hide: optimal strategies for cryptic prey against pursuit predators(2005)163 cited
- → Prey species increase activity in refugia free of terrestrial predators(2023)8 cited
- → Mismatched anti-predator behavioral responses in predator-naïve larval anurans(2015)10 cited
- → Do mountain log skinks ( Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii ) modify their behaviour in the presence of two predators?(2004)28 cited