Dissolving the Missing Heritability Problem
Philosophy of Science2017Vol. 84(5), pp. 1055–1067
Citations Over TimeTop 11% of 2017 papers
Abstract
Heritability estimates obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are much lower than those of traditional quantitative methods. This phenomenon has been called the “missing heritability problem.” By analyzing and comparing GWAS and traditional quantitative methods, we first show that the estimates obtained from the latter involve some terms other than additive genetic variance, while the estimates from the former do not. Second, GWAS, when used to estimate heritability, do not take into account additive epigenetic factors transmitted across generations, while traditional quantitative methods do. Given these two points we show that the missing heritability problem can largely be dissolved.
Related Papers
- → The combination of a genome-wide association study of lymphocyte count and analysis of gene expression data reveals novel asthma candidate genes(2012)52 cited
- → Genome-wide association studies may be misinterpreted: genes versus heritability(2011)27 cited
- → Hope for GWAS: Relevant Risk Genes Uncovered from GWAS Statistical Noise(2014)2 cited
- Why odds ratio estimates of GWAS are almost always close to 1.0(2012)
- → Missing Heritability of Complex Traits and Diseases(2019)11 cited