Structural properties of promoters: similarities and differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Citations Over TimeTop 14% of 2005 papers

Abstract

During the process of transcription, RNA polymerase can exactly locate a promoter sequence in the complex maze of a genome. Several experimental studies and computational analyses have shown that the promoter sequences apparently possess some special properties, such as unusual DNA structures and low stability, which make them distinct from the rest of the genome. But most of these studies have been carried out on a particular set of promoter sequences or on promoter sequences from similar organisms. To examine whether the promoters from a wide variety of organisms share these special properties, we have carried out an analysis of sets of promoters from bacteria, vertebrates and plants. These promoters were analyzed with respect to the prediction of three different properties, such as DNA curvature, bendability and stability, which are relevant to transcription. All the promoter sequences are predicted to share certain features, such as stability and bendability profiles, but there are significant differences in DNA curvature profiles and nucleotide composition between the different organisms. These similarities and differences are correlated with some of the known facts about transcription process in the promoters from the three groups of organisms.

Related Papers

• → Selectivity of theEscherichia coliRNA polymerase Eσ38for overlapping promoters and ability to support CRP activation(1995)126 cited
• → Mycobacterial RNA polymerase forms unstable open promoter complexes that are stabilized by CarD(2014)75 cited
• → Prevalence of RNA polymerase stalling at Escherichia coli promoters after open complex formation(2008)64 cited
• → Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigmaF holoenzyme involved in transcription of flagellar and chemotaxis genes(1997)59 cited
• → Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T4 AsiA 1 1Edited by E. Ebright(1998)85 cited