Deep learning identifies erroneous microarray-based, gene-level conclusions in literature
Citations Over Time
Abstract
More than 110 000 publications have used microarrays to decipher phenotype-associated genes, clinical biomarkers and gene functions. Microarrays rely on digital assaying the fluorescence signals of arrays. In this study, we retrospectively constructed raw images for 37 724 published microarray data, and developed deep learning algorithms to automatically detect systematic defects. We report that an alarming amount of 26.73% of the microarray-based studies are affected by serious imaging defects. By literature mining, we found that publications associated with these affected microarrays have reported disproportionately more biological discoveries on the genes in the contaminated areas compared to other genes. 28.82% of the gene-level conclusions reported in these publications were based on measurements falling into the contaminated area, indicating severe, systematic problems caused by such contaminations. We provided the identified published, problematic datasets, affected genes and the imputed arrays as well as software tools for scanning such contamination that will become essential to future studies to scrutinize and critically analyze microarray data.
Related Papers
- → [20] The Application of Tissue Microarrays in the Validation of Microarray Results(2006)39 cited
- → Comparative study of microarray and experimental data on Schwann cells in peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration: big data analysis(2019)14 cited
- → The promise and perils of microarray analysis(2006)8 cited
- → A standardized fold change method for microarray differential expression analysis used to reveal genes involved in acute rejection in murine allograft models(2017)3 cited
- Screening and Identification of Functional Gene Sets in Aged Kidney-Yang Deficiency Syndrome:cDNA microarray assay(2008)