The Preservation of Amoraic Argumentation
1990pp. 50–78
Abstract
Abstract The extent to which we understand the amoraim of the middle generations to have distanced themselves from earlier models depends heavily on our view of their involvement in the preservation of argumentation. There is of course no question that they participated in argumentation; there is ample evidence of the fact that they did. But there is also little question that their amoraic predecessors, or the tannaim before them, also participated in argumentation.
Related Papers
- → Theoretical Considerations on Analytical Framework Design for the Interactions between Participants in Group Argumentation on Socio-Scientific Issues(2012)6 cited
- → The argumentation in Galatians(2010)2 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → The Basic Categories and Assumptions for Contemporary Chinese Argumentation Studies(2016)
- → Feminisms and Argumentation(2016)