Effects of occupancy estimation on abundance–occupancy relationships
Citations Over TimeTop 18% of 2022 papers
Abstract
Abundance-occupancy relationships predict that species that occupy more sites are also more locally abundant, where occupancy is usually estimated following the assumption that species can occupy all sampled sites. Here we use the National Ecological Observatory Network small-mammal data to assess whether this assumption affects abundance-occupancy relationships. We estimated occupancy considering all sampled sites (traditional occupancy) and only the sites found within the species geographic range (spatial occupancy) and realized environmental niche (environmental occupancy). We found that when occupancy was estimated considering only sites possible for the species to colonize (spatial and environmental occupancy) weaker abundance-occupancy relationships were observed. This shows that the assumption that the species can occupy all sampled sites directly affects the assessment of abundance-occupancy relationships. Estimating occupancy considering only sites that are possible for the species to colonize will consequently lead to a more robust assessment of abundance-occupancy relationships.
Related Papers
- → Ecological correlates of geographical range occupancy in North American birds(2007)62 cited
- → The pervasive influence of sampling and methodological artefacts on a macroecological pattern: the abundance–occupancy relationship(2008)35 cited
- → Temporal changes in abundance–occupancy relationships over 40 years(2019)13 cited
- → Estimating Cape hare occupancy and abundance in southern Tunisia using spotlighting data(2017)5 cited
- → A closer look at the species behind abundance–occupancy relationships(2013)3 cited