A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Abstract Although the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is widely acknowledged to be a poor indicator of the quality of individual papers, it is used routinely to evaluate research and researchers. Here, we present a simple method for generating the citation distributions that underlie JIFs. Application of this straightforward protocol reveals the full extent of the skew of these distributions and the variation in citations received by published papers that is characteristic of all scientific journals. Although there are differences among journals across the spectrum of JIFs, the citation distributions overlap extensively, demonstrating that the citation performance of individual papers cannot be inferred from the JIF. We propose that this methodology be adopted by all journals as a move to greater transparency, one that should help to refocus attention on individual pieces of work and counter the inappropriate usage of JIFs during the process of research assessment.
Related Papers
- Journal impact factor and its importance for AFP.(2008)
- → On formulations of skew factor models: Skew factors and/or skew errors(2020)4 cited
- → Study on Belt Skew. 2nd Report. Effects of Parameters and Skew Mechanism.(2001)9 cited
- → IMPACT FACTOR WEIGHTED BY 5-YEAR IMPACT FACTOR(2015)2 cited
- → On two-sided skew braces(2022)