Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation – a benchmark of computational metagenomics software

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Abstract In metagenome analysis, computational methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key components facilitating downstream biological data interpretation. However, a lack of consensus about benchmarking datasets and evaluation metrics complicates proper performance assessment. The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge has engaged the global developer community to benchmark their programs on datasets of unprecedented complexity and realism. Benchmark metagenomes were generated from ~700 newly sequenced microorganisms and ~600 novel viruses and plasmids, including genomes with varying degrees of relatedness to each other and to publicly available ones and representing common experimental setups. Across all datasets, assembly and genome binning programs performed well for species represented by individual genomes, while performance was substantially affected by the presence of related strains. Taxonomic profiling and binning programs were proficient at high taxonomic ranks, with a notable performance decrease below the family level. Parameter settings substantially impacted performances, underscoring the importance of program reproducibility. While highlighting current challenges in computational metagenomics, the CAMI results provide a roadmap for software selection to answer specific research questions.

Related Papers

• Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's Best(1993)
• → COMPARISON OF BEST PRACTICE BENCHMARKING MODELS(2011)11 cited
• → A guide for mental health clinicians to develop and undertake benchmarking activities(2010)2 cited
• Theoretical Aspects of Benchmarking Theory(2004)
• → Comparing ourselves: using benchmarking techniques to measure performance between academic libraries(2009)1 cited