Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1998 papers

Abstract

We give a classical confidence belt construction which unifies the treatment of upper confidence limits for null results and two-sided confidence intervals for non-null results. The unified treatment solves a problem (apparently not previously recognized) that the choice of upper limit or two-sided intervals leads to intervals which are not confidence intervals if the choice is based on the data. We apply the construction to two related problems which have recently been a battleground between classical and Bayesian statistics: Poisson processes with background and Gaussian errors with a bounded physical region. In contrast with the usual classical construction for upper limits, our construction avoids unphysical confidence intervals. In contrast with some popular Bayesian intervals, our intervals eliminate conservatism (frequentist coverage greater than the stated confidence) in the Gaussian case and reduce it to a level dictated by discreteness in the Poisson case. We generalize the method in order to apply it to analysis of experiments searching for neutrino oscillations. We show that this technique both gives correct coverage and is powerful, while other classical techniques that have been used by neutrino oscillation search experiments fail one or both of these criteria.

Related Papers

• → Confidence Intervals for Difference Between Two Poisson Rates(2011)23 cited
• → Model-averaged confidence distributions(2019)5 cited
• Confidence intervals for the variance and the ratio of two variances of non-normal distributions with missing data(2010)
• → Constructing Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Proportions from Multivariate Binomial Distributions(2009)1 cited
• A Comparison of Some Approximate Confidence Intervals for he Poisson Parameter(2000)