Inclusiveη′production from theΥ(1S)
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields2003Vol. 67(5)
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2003 papers
M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache, S. Blusk, K. Bukin, E. Dambasuren, R. Mountain, H. Muramatsu, R. Nandakumar, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, A. H. Mahmood, S. E. Csorna, I. Dankó, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, M. Dubrovin, S. McGee, Adolf Bornheim, E. Lipeles, S. P. Pappas, A. Shapiro, W. Sun, A. J. Weinstein, R. A. Briere, G. P. Chen, T. Ferguson, G. Tatishvili, H. Vogel, N. E. Adam, J. P. Alexander, K. Berkelman, V. Boisvert, D. G. Cassel, P. S. Drell, J. E. Duboscq, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, R. S. Galik, L. Gibbons, B. Gittelman, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, L. Hsu, C. D. Jones, J. Kandaswamy, D. L. Kreinick, A. Magerkurth, H. Mahlke-Krüger, T. O. Meyer, N. B. Mistry, J. R. Patterson, D. Peterson, J. Pivarski, S. J. Richichi, D. Riley, A. J. Sadoff, H. Schwarthoff, M. R. Shepherd, J. G. Thayer, D. Urner, T. Wilksen, A. Warburton, M. Weinberger, S. B. Athar, P. Avery, L. Breva-Newell, V. Potlia, H. Stoeck, J. Yelton, K. Benslama, B. I. Eisenstein, G. D. Gollin, I. Karliner, N. Lowrey, C. Plager, C. Sedlack, M. Selen, J. J. Thaler, J. Williams, K. W. Edwards, R. Ammar, D. Besson, X. Zhao, S. Anderson, V. Frolov, D. T. Gong, Y. Kubota, S. Z. Li, R. Poling, A. Smith, C. J. Stepaniak, J. Urheim, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, A. Tomaradze, P. Zweber, S. Ahmed, M. S. Alam, J. Ernst, L. Jian, M. Saleem, F. Wappler, K. Arms, E. A. Eckhart, K. K. Gan, C. Gwon, K. Honscheid, D. Hufnagel, H. Kagan, R. D. Kass, T. K. Pedlar, E. von Toerne, M. M. Zoeller, H. Severini, P. Skubic, S. Dytman, J. Mueller, S. Nam, V. Savinov, S. Chen, J. W. Hinson, J. Lee, D. H. Miller, V. Pavlunin, E. I. Shibata, I. P. J. Shipsey, D. Cronin-Hennessy, A. L. Lyon, C. S. Park, W. Park, J. B. Thayer, E. H. Thorndike, T. E. Coan, Y. S. Gao, F. Liu, Y. Maravin, R. Stroynowski
Abstract
Using the CLEO II detector at CESR, we measure the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ energy spectra in $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S)$ decays that we compare with models of the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}{g}^{*}g$ form factor. This form factor, especially at large ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ energies, may provide an explanation of the large rate for $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{B}{X}_{s}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}.$ Our data do not support a large anomalous coupling at higher ${q}^{2}$ and thus the large ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ rate remains a mystery, possibly requiring a non-standard-model explanation.
Related Papers
- → Lepton flavor violating Higgs boson decays from massive seesaw neutrinos(2005)145 cited
- → Lepton flavor violating Higgs boson decays in the MSSM-seesaw(2004)3 cited
- → Imprint of quark flavor violating SUSY in h(125) decays at future lepton colliders(2022)1 cited
- → Flavor Mixing Phenomenology in Supersymmetric Models(2016)
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)